Evaluating Land Ceiling Laws: Impact on Economic Development:

Introduction:

Goes back to Independence Land reforms regulation and measures considered to be of vital importance for establishing economic equality in agrarian structures. One of the most imperative ways to overcome inequality is by putting a ceiling on Land Holdings. Land celling generally means excess away large land holdings and redistribute them to Landless labour and small cultivators.

However, it is not very easy to put a land ceiling simply based on the will of the authority regulating the same. There is no standard criteria which measure or put a benchmark on the amount of land to be restricted to a particular individual or family. Moreover, there is a huge amount of exceptions available which many a time make land ceiling legislation redundant in their implementation.

This blog will critically evaluate the need to enact land ceiling laws in India and also illuminate the major limitation in the fair implementation of Land ceiling statutes. The blog will conclude by suggesting the need for some reforms to make this regulation more fair and just to overcome the century-old inequality in the distribution of Agricultural land.

Need for Land Ceiling Laws in India:

India presently accounts for 2.4% of the global surface area but feeds 16.7% of the world's population. Even though the world has become so much mechanised and modernised, 47.1% of India’s population is still dependent on agricultural activities for their livelihood. When the world enters into the arena of dynamic Artificial Intelligence  Agriculture remains the lifeline of the Indian economy and demography.

There is a history of great disparity in land holdings in India, and this segment continues to exist even at the contemporary social and economic setup. As per an authentic  2018 report, approximately 85% of agrarian households in India own less than 2 hectares of land and collectively 9% of the total income. However, on the other hand, 9% of the farmer's households own large parcels of land and collectively earn 91% of the total income. This data is itself testimony to the huge amount of inequality rooted in India’s land distribution system. 

But the right implementation of land ceiling statutes can make a huge difference and also can overcome this deeply rooted predicament of huge disparity in the distribution of land holdings. However, the implementation of the Land ceiling statutes is totally dependent on political will because since independence, these reforms were tried by almost all the state government of the time, but that didn’t make a huge difference in the condition of land holding as existed at that time.

Gaps in Implementing Land Ceiling Laws in India:

No one hides the fact that different stakeholders use many unfair means to protect the dilution of their land. S.K. Ray, demonstrating his perception of the failure of land ceiling laws, advocates that agrarian reorganization in India fails to positively impact the socioeconomic status of small cultivators.

After the British left India and a new government was established from the initial few, they also undertook the task of land reforms to redistribute land, considering the equity principle a priority. Almost all State governments enacted their land ceiling laws to completely abolish Landlordism and take action to distribute the land equally to form an egalitarian country.

But these land reforms were implemented without any sort of enthusiasm by executive agencies. Due to this lack of political audacity, these reforms could not produce fruits, and inequity based on the distribution of land continues to be prevalent in the modern economic realm. Comparatively, a big number of tenets were evicted in the name of self-cultivation, which consequently resulted in the emergence of absentee landlordism.  Which have no interest in the community,

 The main issue in implementing the land ceiling laws was that the policies adopted to redistribute the land through land holding ceiling lacks the intention of the overall public interest. This resulted in a huge disparity between the policies and legislations and also between statute and their peaceful implementation. This also resulted negatively to overall productivity of agricultural output.

Although there are many complexities in implementing the Land ceiling policies, like lack of uniformity and difference in units between cash and food crops, the most controversial factor of these policies was an exemption clause in land ceiling statutes. such as Agricultural land, Religious denominations, and Industrial and semi-industrial lands were exempted from the purview of these laws.

As in Andhra Pradesh, eight types of land are exempted from the implementation of this Act. In Bihar, Land utilized by religious institutions, Industries and land held by the Banks are exempted from the land ceiling. Likewise, in Haryana exemption is provided for religious and charitable institutions. However, these exemption clauses can be very detrimental for the right implementation of land ceiling legislatures because they act as a barrier to fairly distributing land  among the most historically deprived section of the country.

The State of Himachal Pradesh created a model in the realm of Land ceiling laws by enacting a Land ceiling statute that provides minimal exception clauses and is thus successful in fairly and equally implementing the law. Moreover, the other problem these statutes encountered was misuse by many landlords through forged registration in the name of their relatives or family members. All these unfair means restrain the inclusive development of the society.

Economic Implication of  Ceiling Reforms:

The Economic impacts of land ceiling statutes are not as worthwhile as expected by government agencies. The tenancy reforms failed to achieve their desired objective to establish an egalitarian society by redistributing land equally to attain economic sustainability in the country.

Consequently, according to relevant sources, large farmers in India have 45 times more land area than marginal and small farmers. In simple terms, approximately  4.9% of farmers own 32% of the total farmland of the country. These figures demonstrate how land is unequally distributed in India, even after the enactment of many land ceiling statutes.

 Possible Reforms:

There is a serious need for reforms in Land ceiling laws in India.  The following are important measures that Authorities should incorporate to establish equal distribution of land.

i.                    The land ceiling statute must address the problem of unfair means used by landowners to exclude their land from the ceiling through fraudulent partition. This issue can be redressed by enhancing the surveillance of landowners suspected of using unfair methods to exempt their land from the ceiling.

ii.                   The Authorities now must have to ensure that a minimal exemption is provided in the ceiling of landholdings. These exemptions act as a hurdle when it comes to redistributing the land fairly to achieve equality in the society.

iii.                Due to the complete autonomy state in enacting the policies of land reforms, which sometimes lead to intricacies and loopholes. The subject of land reforms should be transferred from the state to the concurrent list to enhance transparency and accountability in implementing the statute.

Conclusion:

The importance of Land ceiling laws cannot be doubted, but their lack of implementation compelled us to ponder the reason for their failure to achieve the desired objective. The Economic implication is itself the testimony of the lack of political and social audacity in redistributing the land to the deprived section of the society. Removing the exception clauses with some other reforms can act as a game changer in providing the justness in realm of distribution of the land.

 References:

1.      https://thelawbrigade.com/property-law/agriculture-land-and-ceiling-laws-in-india-an-overview/?amp

2.      Pal, S., Roy Chowdhury, P., & Saher, Z. (2021). Land Ceiling Legislations, Land Acquisition and De-industrialisation: Theory and Evidence from the Indian States (IZA DP No. 14624). IZA Institute of Labor Economics.

3.      https://mrunal.org/2013/10/land-reforms-land-ceiling-meaning-pro-anti-arguments.html

4.      https://unacademy.com/content/wbpsc/study-material/geography/ceiling-on-landholdings/#:~:text=Ceiling%20on%20land%20holdings%20is,that%20an%20individual%20can%20own


 BY: AZIZ UMAR 

1st year B A. LLB Student 8 Faculty of law Jamia Millia Islamia University New Delhi